on southbound Route 4, south of Westlake Boulevard in Prince Frederick.Īccording to a preliminary investigation, the Chevrolet was traveling south on Route 4 when it overturned. Troopers from the Prince Frederick Barrack responded to the crash, which happened at approximately 2 p.m. He was the driver of a 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.Ī passenger, 48, also of Upper Marlboro, was flown by Maryland State Police Aviation Command to the University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center for her injuries. The deceased, James Everett Patterson Jr., 56, of Upper Marlboro, Maryland, was pronounced deceased at the scene. Jerry Cornfield: 36 Twitter: dospueblos.UPDATE : Maryland State Police are investigating a fatal single-vehicle crash in Calvert County. Now, when in that same area, “I absolutely never speed down that road.” “I have been someone who has been ticketed through a red light camera” for speeding in a school zone, she said, not revealing in which city. No pictures should contain the face of a driver or passenger.Ĭouncil members hope the presence of cameras will get drivers to change their habits, boosting safety at those intersections.Ĭouncil President Brenda Stonecipher said they do. In addition, the city is requiring the camera system provide at least three digital color still images of each potential violation, including one that is a close-up of the license plate. The owner of the offending vehicle would be issued an infraction notice with the photographs of the violation from the supplier. Provisions in the proposal require that cameras capture the image at the precise time a vehicle crosses the stop line, where the traffic signal light turns red. Council members said the net revenue, $208,000, should be spent on traffic safety projects such as enhanced crosswalks, lighting, sidewalks and speed beacons in the areas where cameras are installed. She did vote to solicit proposals.Ĭouncilmember Judy Tuohy said the city should closely monitor the program to make sure it does not target any particular community members.Įverett staff estimate annual revenue from fines would be $1,375,000, though the penalty, likely between $124 and $250, has not been set.Īnnual costs, including the contract and employees to manage the program, would be $1,167,000. She said public trust in the program will be undermined if residents feel steamrolled by the process. And, she said, studies show that while T-bone crashes - in which one vehicle strikes the side of another - may decline, rear-end collisions climb.Ĭouncilmember Mary Fosse, citing opposition from leaders of communities of color, sought to table the decision for a month to allow for more conversations. In it, the groups cite “mounting evidence” that camera programs have “zero” positive impact on safety while hurting people of color and low-income families. Everett resident Demi Chatters read it during public comments. The NAACP Snohomish County and Snohomish Ebony PAC submitted a joint letter opposing the program. “But my concerns remain with the equity of this proposal and its fine-based system that disproportionately impacts low-income people who are disproportionately communities of color.” We want it to be safe to walk, safe to bike, safe to stroller, safe to drive,” she said. “I can say with certainty that every single person here wants safe streets. She reiterated her concern with the equity of placing cameras at intersections in some of the city neighborhoods with the lowest median income and high populations of people of color. I am in favor of slowing people down at Horizon.”Ĭouncilmember Paula Rhyne cast the dissenting vote. “We desperately need change in our physical environment to make it safer for everybody. “I’ve gone yes-no, yes-no, yes-no in my own head,” said Councilmember Liz Vogeli. Those in the majority stressed they view cameras as a tool for making those intersections safer but not the only step the city must take. The decision, approved on a 6-1 vote, implements the Automated Traffic Safety Camera Program that has been on the books since 2008.Ĭouncil members tabled action in January amid questions about the program and equity in the choice of intersections.ĭuring Wednesday’s discussion, members said it wasn’t an easy decision.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |